The problem of finding and implementing modern interactive technologies as a principle of effective education reform during active hostilities
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.38014/ehs-ss.2025.1.03Keywords:
innovative educational technologies, modern interactive technologies, problem-based learning technologies, contextual learning technologies, technology for organising project and research activities, 4K forming technologies, digital technologies, game technologiesAbstract
The article substantiates the expediency of searching for and implementing modern educational technologies, taking into account their effectiveness and efficiency in reforming education against the background of active hostilities. The relevance of this problem lies in the fact that the trend of ‘life-long learning’ as ‘lifelong learning’ is opposed to the traditional ‘lifelong learning’ and involves the continuous development of personal effectiveness of today's students, and educational technologies, methods and techniques are designed to provide them with constant access to learning and prepare future professionals to be competitive and proactive in the VUCA world. The use of modern educational tools through the principle of interactivity changes the logic of the educational process (learning does not take place from theory to practice, but from the formation of new experience to its theoretical understanding through application), which meets the requirements of considering several interactive technologies: problem-based learning, organisation of project and research activities, digital technologies, contextual learning, game technologies, technologies for the formation of 4K (critical and creative thinking, cooperation and communication). The potential of interactive educational tools will ensure that future specialists achieve the educational outcomes in demand in the 21st century, develop ‘flexible’ competences, and
professional competitiveness.
References
Meyers, E. M., Erickson, I., & Small, R. V. (2013). Digital literacy and informal learning environments: An introduction. Learning, Media and Technology, 38(4), 355–367. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2013.783597
Ries, F., Cabrera, C. Y., & Carriedo, R. G. (2016). A study of teacher training in the United States and Europe. The European Journal of Social and Behavioural Sciences, 17(2), 2029–2054.
Eastman, J. K., Iyer, R., & Eastman, K. L. (2009). Interactive technology in the classroom: An exploratory look at its use and effectiveness. Contemporary Issues in Education Research, 2(3), 31–38.
Hoffman, C., & Goodwin, S. (2006). A clicker for your thoughts: Technology for active learning. New Library World, 107(9/10), 422–433. https://doi.org/10.1108/03074800610702606
Borthwick, A. C., & Hansen, R. (2017). Digital literacy in teacher education: Are teachers competent? Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 33(2), 46–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2017.1291249
Kroksmark, T. (2015). Teachers’ subject competence in digital times. Education Inquiry, 6. https://doi.org/10.3402/edui.v6.24013
McKnight, K., O'Malley, K., Ruzich, R., et al. (2016). Teaching in a digital age: 7. How educators use technology to improve student learning. Journal of Research in Technology in Education, 48(3), 194–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2016.1175856
Jahnke, I., & Norberg, A. (2014). Digital didactics: Scaffolding a new normality of learning. Higher Education. Visionary Paper for Open Education 2030, 129–137.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Tetyana ONISHCHENKO, Olena KORNIENKO, Olena RYABOKON, Volodymyr SALIONOV
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
_small1.png){kind=logo}
