Value orientations as factors in the attitude of youth to European integration
Abstract
The article examines dynamics of change in the geopolitical situation in 2020 related to COVID-19 pandemic that led to the transformations of the system of value orientations in young people in the post-COVID-19 period on Ukraine’s European integration. Humanity has entered a long period of increased unpredictable, uncontrolled situation of the virus spread that forced the EU countries to adjust areas of interaction and mutual adaptation of national economies to the prevailing conditions .In this context the problem of the attitude of the young generation ( from 15 to 30 years) to the components and standards of European integration acquires special theoretical and methodological significance. The authors of the article make an attempt at psychological analysis of aspects of the attitude of youth to the integrity of European civilization, including how value orientations of modern times affect the ontogenesis of the individual. In line with the research, a theoretical understanding of the psychological content of the concept “European integration of Ukraine” was carried out, the distinction between the concepts of values and value orientations has been made, the psychological specifics of the attitude of young people to the scientific understanding of the EU structure and core values were determined. Attractiveness of joining the EU, its advantages, achievements and difficulties were singled out. Obstacles and barriers along the way the country’s European integration, from the point of view of the growing generation, were highlighted.
References
Bekh I.D. (2006). Vykhovannia osobystosti: skhodzhennia do dukhovnosti // Lybid. 272 s.
Biliaiev Ya.M. (2019). Uzahalnennia svitovoho dosvidu derzhavnoi polityky sotsialnoi mobilnosti molodi//Vcheni zapysky TNU imeni V. I Vernadskoho. Seriia : Derzhavne upravlinnia. №3. S.30-36.
Vasyliev A. (2013). Konverhentsiia modelei realizatsii derzhavnoi polityky, spriamovanoi na molod// Publichne upravlinnia: teoriia ta praktyka. №3. S. 205-209.
Halian I. (2016). Tsinnisno-smyslova samorehuliatsiia osobystosti: heneza ta mekhanizmy funktsionuvannia. Drohobych: Red.-vydav. Viddil DDPU imeni Ivana Franka. 402 s.
Halian I., Halian O. (2020). Smyslova samorehuliatsiia yak zdoroviazberihaiucha tekhnolohiia// Psykhichne zdorovia osobystosti u kryzovomu suspilstvi: zbirnyk materialiv IV Vseukrainskoi naukovo-praktychnoi konferentsii (23 zhovtnia 2020 roku) / uklad. Z.R. Kisil. Lviv: Lvivskyi derzhavnyi universytet vnutrishnikh sprav. s. 32.
Dmytruk N. (2017). Mizh materializmom i post materializmom: tsinnisni oriientatsii suchasnoi ukrainskoi molodi// Visnyk APST. №3. S. 57-66.
Donchenko T. (2009). Osnovni modeli derzhavnoi molodizhnoi polityky: zakordonnyi ta vitchyznianyi dosvid // Efektyvnist derzhavnoho upravlinnia: zb. nauk. prats LRIDU NADU. №18. S. 126-133.
Leontev D. (1999). Psykholohyia smysla: pryroda, stroenye y dynamka smyslovoi realnosty. M: Smysl. S.155-158.
Matiazh S.V., Berezianska A.O. (2013). Klasyfikatsiia tsinnostei ta tsinnisnykh oriientatsii osobystosti // Naukovi pratsi [Chornomorskoho derzhavnoho universytetu imeni Petra Mohyly] / Seriia: Sotsiolohiia. T. 255. Vyp. 213. S. 27-30.
Molodizhna stratehiia Yevropeiskoho Soiuzu (EU Youth Strategy). - Rezhym dostupu: https://europa.eu./youth/home_en
Rybalka V. V. (2020). Karantinnyi obraz zhyzny lychnosty i obshchestva kak stimul kratsyonalnoi sanohennoi perestroike soznanyia, povedenyia y dejatelnosti // COVID-19 v izmerenijakh filosofii, psikholohii i pedagohiky: posobie/[pod nauch. red. V.V.Rybalki i A.P.Samodryna; kollektyv avtorov]. Kyiv, Dnepr, Kremenchuh: PP Shcherbatykh A.V. C. 294-307.
Stratehiia OON shchodo molodi na period do 2030 roku (Youth 2030: The United Nations Strategy on Youth). 2018. Rezhym dostupu: https://www.un.org/youthenvoy/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/18-00080_UN_Youth-Strategy_Web/pdf
Frankl V. (2020). U poshukakh spravzhnoho sensu. Psykholoh u kontstabori. K., 2020.
Tsinnisni oriientatsii suchasnoi ukrainskoi molodi. Shchorichna dopovid Prezydentu Ukrainy, Verkhovnii Radi Ukrainy pro stanovyshche molodi v Ukraini (za pidsumkamy 2015 roku) / Derzh.in-t simeinoi ta molodizhnoi polityky; [redkol.: Zhdanov I. O., hol. red. koleh. Yarema O. I. Beliaieva I. I. ta in.]. K., 2016. 200 c.
Cherednychenko A. (2021). Formuvannia tsinnostei obiednanoi Yevropy v ukrainskomu prostori //Aktualni problemy yevropeiskoi ta yevroatlantychnoi intehratsii Ukrainy: materialy 18-yi rehionalnoi naukovo-praktychnoi konferentsii 13 travnia 2021r. m.Dnipro /za zah.red. L. Prokopenka. D.: DRIDU NADU. S.23-25
Yakymenko Yu., Pashkov M. (2018). Ukraina na shliakhu do YeS: otsinky, dumky i spodivannia hromadian. Transievropeiska asotsiatsiia politychnykh doslidzhen, 2018. – Rezhym dostupu: http://www.tepsa.eu/23326-2
Bojanowska A., Kaczmarek L. et al.(2021). Changes in Values and Well-Being Admist the COVID-19 Pandemic in Poland. PLoS ONE 16 (9):eO255491. https//dos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0255491.
Derkach L., Minka P. (2012) Ways of Learning and Living in Ukraine: A New Paradigm. - Monograph./Eds.M.Giliberto, C.Dell’Aversano & F. Velicogna “PCP and Constructivism: Ways of Working, Learning and Living”. Libri Liberi. Firenze. 2012, pp. 547-554.
Derkach L.M. (2018). Problems, Challenges and Perspectives of Ukraine’s Integration Into Global and European Educational Space. American Journal of Fundamental, Applied & Experimental Research, 2018/3 (10), pp. 13-19.
Junges Europa 2017: So denken Menschen zwischen 16 und 26 Jahren / Jugendstudie der Tuistiftung / URL:https://www.tui-stiftung.de/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/Wichtige-Ergebnisse-der-Studie/pdf.



_small1.png)

