Technology of blended learning in institutions of higher education in war conditions
Аннотация
The aim of the research is to develop an adaptive technology of mixed learning that will provide flexible training of future specialists in war conditions and experimentally verify its effectiveness. Research materials and methods. A systematic literature analysis was carried out; study of the conceptual apparatus; modeling; generalization of pedagogical experience. The pedagogical experiment was conducted on the basis of Vinnytsia National Agrarian University. Groups of 278 and 281 students were allocated. The following activities were used: observation, data analysis, questionnaires, interviews, student testing, the method of diagnostic control works, mathematical processing of research results, qualitative and quantitative analysis (with Mathcad tools). The results obtained. All performance indicators of the developed technology (knowledge, skills, communication, autonomy and responsibility) increased in the experimental groups. Indicators of the ability to carry out independent and collective activities have significantly been improved. It was found that effective means of technology implementation are: the Moodle learning management system, the “Socrates” electronic management system, the Zoom service, the Telegram messenger, and the
electronic board (Whiteboard). In the mathematical training of specialists, it is advisable to use the Drawchat web service, Texas Instruments and Casio graphic calculators, Matcad, Maple and Mathematica computer algebra systems, GeoGebra and Cabri interactive geometry software, virtual and augmented reality (VR/AR) technologies, online – math textbooks and resources from Khan Academy, Wolfram Alpha and Coursera. Conclusions. Taking into account the ongoing conflict in Ukraine, the implementation of traditional methods of face-to-face education in some regions may be difficult. Universities will need to be flexible and, where
necessary, adapt their traditional educational models to ensure students have access to quality education and support. The implementation of a blended learning model will allow students to take advantage of both online and offline learning. It will also provide a flexible and adaptable approach that takes into account the needs and constraints of students and the university. A student-centered approach is the basis for designing an educational environment. Scientific and pedagogical workers should focus not only on the achievement of such program results as “knowledge and understanding” and “application of knowledge and understanding”,
but also “the ability to form judgments and formulate conclusions”, “communicative abilities”, “learning skills or abilities to study”. The technology of mixed learning involves the following design stages: preparation, design, implementation. Technology design will be effective under the following pedagogical conditions: compliance with the principles of systemic individualization, differentiation and creative activity of students; personal orientation of education; integration of fundamental and special knowledge based on the professional focus of the disciplines. Practical application: the developed technology can be applied in the study of other disciplines. The results of the research can be used to design the content of blended learning or distance education. Originality: theoretically justified and developed an adaptive model of designing a student-centered technology of mixed learning in war conditions.
Литература
Ukraine war response: Ensuring access to learning. URL: https://www.unicef.org/emergencies/ukraine-war-response-ensuring-access-learning
Recommendations on the organization of the educational process under the conditions of martial law: URL: https://mon.gov.ua/ua/news/sergij-shkarletrozpoviv-pro-organizaciyu-osvitnogo-procesu-u-zakladah-osviti
Heymann, P., Bastiaens, E., Jansen, A., van Rosmalen, P. and Beausaert, S. (2022), A conceptual model of students’ reflective practice for the development of employability competences, supported by an online learning platform, Education + Training, Vol. 64, № 3, pp. 380-397. https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-05-2021-0161
Gwo-Jen Hwang, Sheng-Yuan Wang, Chiu-Lin Lai (2021), Effects of a social regulation-based online learning framework on students’ learning achievements and behaviors in mathematics, Computers & Education, Vol. 160, Article 104031. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104031
Yorkovsky Y., Levenberg I. (2022) Distance learning in science and mathematics – Advantages and disadvantages based on pre-service teachers’ experience, Teaching and Teacher Education, Vol. 120, Article 103883. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. tate.2022.103883
Md. Al-Amin, Abdullah Al Zubayer, Badhon Deb, Mehedi Hasan, (2021), Status of tertiary level online class in Bangladesh: students’ response on preparedness, participation and classroom activities, Heliyon, Vol. 7, № 1, e05943. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e05943
Dubey P. & Pandey D.. (2020), Distance Learning in Higher Education during Pandemic: Challenges and Opportunities, The International Journal of Indian Psychology Vol. 8, №.1, pp. 43-46. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.822958
Canales-Ronda P. & Aragonés-Jericó C., (2022), Agile methodologies in times of of pandemic: acquisition of employment skills in higher education, Education + Training, Vol. 64, No. 6, pp. 811-825. https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-12-2021-0445
Hui-Chen Lin, Gwo-Jen Hwang, Shao-Chen Chang, Yaw-Don Hsu, (2021), Facilitating critical thinking in decision making-based professional training: An online interactive peer-review approach in a flipped learning context, Computers & Education, Vol. 173, Article 104266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104266
Shurui Bai, Khe Foon Hew, Biyun Huang, (2020), Does gamification improve student learning outcome? Evidence from a meta-analysis and synthesis of qualitative data in educational contexts, Educational Research Review, Vol. 30, Article 100322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100322
Thanheiser E., Melhuish K., (2023), Teaching routines and student-centered mathematics instruction: The essential role of conferring to understand student thinking and reasoning, The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, Vol. 70, Article 101032. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2023.101032
Theerapong Binali, Chin-Chung Tsai, Hsin-Yi Chang, (2021), University students’ profiles of online learning and their relation to online metacognitive regulation and internet-specific epistemic justification, Computers & Education, Vol.175, Article 104315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104315
Hanan Almarashdi, Adeeb M. Jarrah, (2021), Mathematics Distance Learning amid the COVID-19 Pandemic in the UAE: High School Students’ Perspectives, International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, Vol. 20, № 1, pp. 292-307. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.20.1.16
Mukuka A., Shumba O., Mulenga H., (2021), Students’ experiences with remote learning during the COVID-19 school closure: implications for mathematics education, Heliyon, Vol. 7, № 7, e07523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021. e07523
Drijvers, P., Thurm, D., Vandervieren, E. Klinger M., Moons,F., Ree H., Mol A., Barzel B. & Doorman M., (2021), Distance mathematics teaching in Flanders, Germany, and the Netherlands during COVID-19 lockdown, Educational Studies in Mathematics, Vol. 108, pp. 35-64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-021-10094-5
Krieglstein F., Schneider S., Gröninger J., B. Maik, Steve N., Wesenberg L., Suren M., Günter D., (2023), Exploring the effects of content-related segmentations and metacognitive prompts on learning with whiteboard animations, Computers & Education Vol. 194, Article 104702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104702
Reguera E., Lopez M., (2021), Using a digital whiteboard for student engagement in distance education, Computers & Electrical Engineering. Vol. 93, Article 107268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compeleceng.2021.107268
Stojanović J., Petkovic D., Alarifi I., Yan Cao, Denic N., Ilic J., Assilzadeh H., Resic S., Petkovic B., Khan A., Milickovic M., (2021), Application of distance learning in mathematics through adaptive neuro-fuzzy learning method, Computers & Electrical Engineering, Vol. 93, Article 107270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compeleceng.2021.107270
Fabian K., Topping K., (2019), Putting “mobile” into mathematics: Results of a randomised controlled trial, Contemporary Educational Psychology, Vol. 59, Article 101783. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.101783
Staddon R., (2022), A supported flipped learning model for mathematics gives safety nets for online and blended learning, Computers and Education Open, Vol. 3, Article 100106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2022.100106
Shi Y., Ma, Y. , MacLeod J., Yang H.H., (2020), College students’ cognitive learning outcomes in flipped classroom instruction: a meta-analysis of the empirical literature, Journal of Computers in Education, Vol.7, pp. 79-103. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40692-019-00142-8
Sablan. J. R., Prudente M., (2022), Traditional and flipped learning: which enhances students’ academic performance better?, International Journal of Information and Education Technology, Vol. 12(1), pp. 54-59, https://doi:10.18178/ijiet.2022.12.1.1586
Strelan P., Osborn A., Palmer E., (2020), The flipped classroom: A meta-analysis of effects on student performance across disciplines and education levels, Educational Research Review, Vol. 30, Article 100314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100314
Sun Z., Xie K., Anderman L. H., (2018), The role of self-regulated learning in students’ success in flipped undergraduate math courses, The Internet and Higher Education, Vol. 36, pp. 41-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2017.09.003
Rakes C. R., Ronau R., Bush S., Driskel S. Niess M., Pugalee D., (2020), Mathematics achievement and orientation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of education technology, Educational Research Review, Vol. 31, Article 100337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100337
Mukuka A., Shumba O., Mulenga H. M., (2021), Students’ experiences with remote learning during the COVID-19 school closure: implications for mathematics education, Heliyon, Vol. 7, №. 7, e07523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07523



_small1.png)

