Peculiarities of English-Language professional communication of officers of the Armed Forces of Ukraine: the methodological aspect

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38014/ehs-ss.2025.4.01

Keywords:

English-language professional communication, military education, officers of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, English-language military discourse, linguistic features of military professional communication, foreign language teaching methodology, military terminology

Abstract

The article is devoted to the analysis of the peculiarities of English-language professional communication of officers of the Armed Forces of Ukraine in the context of modern requirements for military education and international military cooperation. The relevance of the study is due to the active integration of Ukraine into the Euro-Atlantic security space, the expansion of the participation of Ukrainian military personnel in joint exercises, peacekeeping missions and multinational operations, where English is the main means of professional communication.
The article reveals the specifics of English-language professional communication of officers, which are determined by the functional orientation of speech, the standardization of military terminology, the regulated nature of communicative situations, the need for rapid decision-making, and clear information exchange. Special attention is paid to the analysis of typical communicative situations of officers’ service and professional activities, in particular during staff work, operational planning, interaction with foreign partners, and the execution of tasks in a multinational environment.
The methodological aspect of the study is focused on substantiating the principles and approaches to teaching English-language professional communication within the system of training military specialists. The expediency of competency-based, communicative-activity, and professionally oriented approaches is determined, as well as the integration of language training with professional disciplines. The role of authentic materials, situational modeling, role-playing simulations, and the case method as effective means of developing officers’ foreign language communicative competence is outlined.
The obtained results may be used in the process of improving foreign language training programs for officers and developing methodological support for teaching English-language professional communication in higher military educational institutions.

References

Bakhov, I. S. (2019). Profesijna inshomovna pidhotovka viiskovosluzhbovtsiv: suchasni pidkhody [Professional foreign language training of military personnel: Modern approaches].

Bihych, O. B. (2017). Metodyka ESP u viiskovii osviti [ESP methodology in military education].

Halai, A. V. (2020). Viiskovyi dyskurs: linhvistychni parametry [Military discourse: Linguistic parameters].

Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine. (2024). Pro pereliky posad viiskovosluzhbovtsiv… [On the list of military positions requiring English proficiency] (Resolution No. 1522, December 27, 2024). Uriadovyi Kurier, (7).

Kozub, M. O. (2020). Rozvytok inshomovnoi pidhotovky ofitseriv Zbroinykh Syl Ukrainy v umovakh intehratsii do standartiv NATO [Development of foreign language training of officers of the Armed Forces of Ukraine in the context of NATO integration]. Viiskova osvita, (1).

Morska, L. V. (2019). Metodychni zasady formuvannia profesiinoi inshomovnoi kompetentnosti viiskovosluzhbovtsiv [Methodological foundations of professional foreign language competence formation of military personnel]. Pedahohichni nauky, (3).

Sokolova, O. V. (2024). Linhvostylistychni ta zhanrovi kharakterystyky anhlomovnoho viiskovoho dyskursu [Linguostylistic and genre characteristics of English military discourse]. Viiskova linhvistyka, (2).

Yakymchuk, B. P. (Ed.). (2021). Inozemna mova u profesiinii pidhotovtsi viiskovosluzhbovtsiv: teoriia i praktyka [Foreign language in professional military training: Theory and practice]. Kyiv: NUOU.

Allied Administrative Publication AAP-06. (2022). NATO glossary of terms and definitions. Brussels: NATO Standardization Office.

Allied Communications Publication. (2013). Voice procedure. Brussels: NATO Communications and Information Agency.

Allied Joint Publication AJP-3. (2019). Allied joint doctrine for the conduct of operations. Brussels: NATO Standardization Office.

Bureau for International Language Coordination. (2009). Military English versus General English: A comparative analysis. Brussels: BILC.

Bureau for International Language Coordination. (2011). STANAG 6001 Level 4 tutorial: Guidelines for test developers. Brussels: BILC.

Crichton, J., & Candlin, C. (2021). Discourses of military communication. London: Routledge.

Danziger, R. (2019). Military terminology and operational communication: Structural features and evolution. Journal of Military Linguistics, 7(1).

Day, J. (2010). Military English. London: Macmillan.

Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. New York: Vintage Books.

Hall, W., & Cameron, R. (2016). Communication standards in NATO operations: Terminology, interoperability and training. Defence Linguistics Review, 12(2).

Hardy, T. (2018). English for military purposes. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars.

Hutchinson, T., & Waters, A. (1987). English for specific purposes: A learningcentred approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Jones, R. (2020). Genre and procedures in operational military communication. Journal of Military Discourse Studies, 5(1).

Military English Guide. (2025). Version 1.4. Brussels–Warsaw: NATO Partner Training Materials.

NATO. (2010). STANAG 6001 language proficiency levels.

NATO Standardization Agreement. (2014). STANAG 6001: Language proficiency levels. Brussels: NATO Standardization Office.

Van Dijk, T. A. (2008). Discourse and power. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Walters, J. (Ed.). (2018). English for military purposes: Teaching and testing practices in NATO countries. London: Defence Languages Institute Press.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-30

How to Cite

SUSLOPAROVA, Y. (2025). Peculiarities of English-Language professional communication of officers of the Armed Forces of Ukraine: the methodological aspect. EUROPEAN HUMANITIES STUDIES: State and Society, 4(4), 4–21. https://doi.org/10.38014/ehs-ss.2025.4.01

Issue

Section

EDUCATION IN THE CONDITIONS OF WAR