Education in the context of an interdisciplinary paradigm in the transitional period

Authors

  • Tetyana DYAK Candidate of Pedagogic Sciences, Associate Professor, Ukrainian National Forestry University, Lviv, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38014/ehs-ss.2019.1-I.06

Keywords:

education, interdisciplinary approach, personality, educational process, synergy, creativity

Abstract

The article “Education in the Context of Interdisciplinary Paradigm in the Transitional Period” by Т. Dyak deals with the issues of interdisciplinary approaches in education in the transitional period. The problems of the essence and distinguishing features of education in the transitional period are defined. The role and place of interdisciplinary bonds as well the requirements for the educational process to meet the needs of the person, society and state are substantiated. The transitional period is revealed to be characterized by the emergence of a set of pedagogical practices caused by the pluralism of cultures, and, consequently, different requirements to education. The formulation of the educational goals and content should take place in a synergistic atmosphere. Intensification of education and the formation of personal qualities appear to be a universal human need nowadays. The problem of creativity as a manifestation of spirituality is emphasized to become the main criterion for the effectiveness of educational processes. Thus, the creation of the necessary, most favorable conditions for self-realization and self-development of a particular person by means of intellectual, emotional, moral, cultural, informational and other vectors of personality formation are found to be the most important tasks.

 

References

Klein J.T. (1990). Interdisciplinarity: History, Theory, and Practice // Wayne State University Press, 1990 - 331 р.

Lyotard J.F. (1984). The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge 1984 University Of Minnesota Press; 1st edition (June 21, 1984) – 144 p.

Newell W.H. (2001). A Theory of Interdisciplinary Studies // Issues in Integrative Studies. No. 19, pp. 1-25 (2001). Available at http:// web.mit.edu/jrankin/www/ interdisciplinary/interdisc_Newell.pdf

Nuyen A. T. (1996). Postmodern Education as Sublimation // Educational Theory 1996. Available at http: // www.ed.uiuc.edu/coe/eps/ET-i996.

Medvedev V.A. (2010). O tendentsiyah razvitiya metodologicheskoy kultury mishleniya / V. A. Medvedev // Voprosy filosofii. – 2010. - № 2. – С. 161-164.

Moren, E. (2007). Obrazovanye v budushchem: sem neotlozhnykh zadach / E. Moren // Sinergeticheskaya paradigm. Sinergetika obrazovaniya. – M.: ProgresTraditsiya, 2007. – S. 24 -97.

Sinergetyka i osvita: monografiya / Za red. V.G. Kremen . – K.: Instytut obdarovanoyi dytyny, 2014. – 348 s.

Fuko M. (1996). Chto takoe prosveshchenie / М. Fuko // Voprosy filosofii. –№ 1-2. – 1996. – S. 50-58.

Downloads

Published

2019-03-23

How to Cite

DYAK, T. . (2019). Education in the context of an interdisciplinary paradigm in the transitional period. EUROPEAN HUMANITIES STUDIES: State and Society, 17(1(I), 74–88. https://doi.org/10.38014/ehs-ss.2019.1-I.06