Behavior strategies as a constituent of the art of living in the risk society

Authors

  • Inna CHUGUEVA V.O. Sukhomlynsky Mykolaiv National University, Mykolaiv, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38014/ehs-ss.2024.3.12

Keywords:

art of living, risk society, culture of oneself, art of living with others, culture of freedom, culture of risk, culture of thinking, temporal culture, the art of living in eco-friendly way, personal educational paradigm, behavior strategy

Abstract

The article is devoted to the problem of finding and developing of the socially productive and constructive forms of life-creation in the risk society. The modern Ukrainian society has all the signs of the risk society: military actions, social and political in stability, economic crisis, activation of migration processes, complications of social practices, pluralism of life strategies and styles, deepening of discrepancy between the new system of requirements and personal capabilities. All these phenomena’s form an extremely complex of coordinates, in which the process of livelihoods of personality occurs.
There is considered the problem of the art of living in the risk society. The main components of the art of living in the risk society are characterized by such categories: "culture of oneself", "the art of living with others", "culture of freedom", "culture of thinking", "culture of risk", "temporal culture", "the art of living in eco-friendly way." The expediency of attracting of the art of living as a value-semantic basis to the personal educational paradigm is substantiated.                                                                                                                             It is emphasized that the problem of existential security exacerbates on the level of individual life. This is due to the fact that a person exists in a situation of a long-terms tress in the risk society, associated with anxiety for his of her well-being, health (physiological, psychological, spiritual, social), authenticity, temporal unity and private life in general.

References

Bek U. (2000). Obshchestvo ryska: na puty k druhomu modernu / U. Bek / [per. s nem. V. Sydelnyka, N. Fedorovoi]. M : Prohress-Tradytsyia. S. 383.

Bell D. (1990). Tretia tekhnolohycheskaia revoliutsyia y ee vozmozhnыe sotsyalnoэkonomycheskye posledstvyia / D. Bell. M. : Prohress. 336 s.

Kleman K. (2007). Fleksybelnost po-rossyisky: ocherk o novыkh formakh truda y podchynenyia v sfere usluh / Kleman K. // Sotsyolohycheskyi zhurnal. № 4. S. 74-91.

Maslou A. (2001). Motyvatsyia y lychnost / A. Maslou [per. s anhl. A.M. Tatlыbaevoi]. SPb. : Evrazyia. 478 s.

Sokhan L.V. (1996). Zhyttietvorchist yak mystetstvo zhyty / Sokhan L.V. // Psykholohiia i pedahohika zhyttietvorchosti: navch.-metod. posibnyk / Red. rada: V.M. Donii (holova), H.M. Nesen (zast. holovy), L.V. Sokhan, I.H. Yermakov (nauk. red.) ta in. K. S. 156 – 167.

Stepanenko N.B. (2009). Kontseptualni kontury filosofii mystetstva zhyty: vytoky i perspektyvy / N. B. Stepanenko // Multyversum. Filosofskyi almanakh: Zb. nauk. prats / Hol. Red.. V. V. Liakh. Vyp. 88. K. S. 63-74.

Sennett R. (1998). The Corrosion of Character - The Personal Consequences of Work in the New Capitalism / Sennett R. New York, 1998, p.148.

Standing G. (2011). The Precariat: The New Dangerous Class / Standing G. Bloomsbury Academic. p. 198.

Published

2024-09-30

How to Cite

CHUGUEVA, I. . (2024). Behavior strategies as a constituent of the art of living in the risk society. EUROPEAN HUMANITIES STUDIES: State and Society, 3(3), 154–164. https://doi.org/10.38014/ehs-ss.2024.3.12

Issue

Section

PHILOSOPHY AND PSYCHOLOGY OF WAR