Metaphysical theories of personality and the problem of demarcation of scientific theoretical nowledge
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.38014/ehs-ss.2015.3.02Keywords:
metaphysical psychology, theory of personality, scientific knowledgeAbstract
The article is devoted to substantiation of the opportunity of introduction of domestic metaphysical theories of personality in scientific use. The reasons of accusation of metaphysical theories of personality in their unscientific nature are revealed. The measure of correctness of positivistic demarcations of knowledge is determined.
References
Kun T. Struktura nauchnyh revoluciy. / Т.Кun; Sost. V.Y.Kuznetsov. – М.: ООО «Izdatelstvo АSТ», 2003. – 605 p.
Lakatos I. Falsifikacia I metodologia nauchno-issledovatelskih programm // Kun T. Struktura nauchnyh revoluciy. / Т.Кun; Sost. V.Y.Kuznetsov. –М.: ООО «Izdatelstvo АSТ», 2003. – P.269-454.
Manokha І.P. Psihologia potayemnogо «ya». – К.: Poligraf kniga, 2001. – 448 p.
Merejkovsky D.S. Аkropol: Izbr. lit.-kritich. statyi. – М.: Кn. palatа, 1991. – 352 p.
Polani M. Lichnostnoye znanie. Nа puti k postkriticheskoy filosofii. – М.: Progress, 1985. – 344 p.
Popper К. Normalnaya nauka i opasnosti, svyazannie s ney // Kun T. Struktura nauchnyh revoluciy. / Т.Кun; Sost. V.Y.Kuznetsov. – М.: ООО
«Izdatelstvo АSТ», 2003. – P.525-538.
Russel B. Chelovecheskoye poznaniye: Еgо sfera I granitsy. – К.: Nika- Centr, 1997. – 560 p.
Fejerabend P. Izbrannye trudy po metodologii nauki / Оbshch. red. I avt. vst. I.S.Narsky. – М.: Progress, 1986. – 542 p.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2015 Аlexander BREUSENKO-KUZNETSOV
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
_small1.png){kind=logo}
