Study of vitality as a resource for providing students’ psychological safety

  • Olena HREK PhD in Psychological Sciences, Associate Professor of Developmental Psychology and Social Communications, State Institution "South Ukrainian National Pedagogical University by K.D. Ushynsky», Odessa, Ukraine
Keywords: vitality, vitality components, meaningful life orientations, psychological safety, stress resistance, students


The article investigates the problem of studying the vitality according to domestic and foreign approaches. The concept of “vitality” and its components, peculiarities of vitality and stress interrelation are considered. The factors that cause stress in humans and the mechanisms of vitality that reduce the impact of stress factors on an individual, as well as characteristics of a student’s age being one of sensitive periods of their manifestation and development of vitality are shown. The author empirically investigates special features and components of vitality development of students-psychologists, who are in their 1-4 years of study at the university. The research involved 80 students from the University after Ushinsky. The following research methods were used: the vitality test by S. Maddy (adapted by D.O. Leontiev and O.I. Rasskazova), the method of life meaningful orientation by D.O. Leontiev, questionnaire “The idea of information and psychological safety” by T.O. Basanova. Spearman’s correlation method and U. Mann-Whitney’s test were used for statistical analysis. According to the results of the study, it was found that the level of the students’ vitality in their 1-4 years was average but a significant increase in indicators was found in those who were in their third year. Peculiarities of the students’ life awareness with different levels of vitality are revealed. Besides, the connections between the indicators of vitality and the components of life meaningful orientations of testees’ are presented. The level of information-and-psychological safety of students and its connection with vital indicators is investigated. That is, vitality as a resource stimulates the activity of students and can ensure their psychological safety in modern realities.


Вaeva I. A., Baev N.N. (2013). Psychological resources of students’ safety as an indicator of psychological security of an individual // Elektronnyj zhurnal «Psihologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie». № 1. r. 1-9. - [Elektronnyj resurs].– URL:

Verbina G.G. Zhiznestojkost' cheloveka kak lichnostnyj resurs dostizheniya vysokogo urovnya fizicheskogo i psihicheskogo zdorov'ya // Klinicheskaya i medicinskaya psihologiya: issledovaniya, obuchenie, praktika: elektron. nauch. zhurn. 2017. T. 5, № 4(18) [Elektronnyj resurs].– URL: [in Russian]

Voronkina L.B. Zhiznestojkost' kak lichnostnyj resurs v obespechenii psihologicheskoj bezopasnosti//V sbornike: Universitetskie chteniya -2017 Materialy nauchno-metodicheskih chtenij PGU. 2017. S. 52-57. [in Russian]

Knizhnikova S.V. Strukturno-funkcional'noe opisanie zhiznestojkosti v aspekte suicidal'noj prevencii (Stat'ya) // Materialy IV Vserossijskoj NPK «Fenomenologiya i profilaktika deviantnogo povedeniya». Krasnodar, 28-29 oktyabrya 2010. S. 67- 70 [in Russian]

Leont’ev D.A., Rasskazova E.I. (2006). Test zhiznestojkosti. Moskva: Smysl. [in Russian]

Loginova M.V. (2009). Zhiznestojkost’ kak vnutrennij klyuchevoj resurs lichnosti. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta MVD Rossii. 6: 9 − 22. [in Russian]

Mannapova K. R. The role of life in life of complex living situations

Golyeva, G.I. (2012). Development of emot onal stability as the key competence of students psychologists. Global Crisis of contemporaniety in the sphere of mindset, social values and polit cal interests correlat on: XXXV Internat onal Research and Pract ce Conference (рр. 112–119). London. (rus)

Tarabrina N.V., Harlamenkova N.E., Padun M.A. (2017). Intensivnyj stress v kontekste psihologicheskoj bezopasnosti [Intensive stress in the context of psychological safety] M.: «Institut psihologii RAN». 344 p. [in Russian]

Tytarenko T.M., Larina T.O. Zhyttiestiikist osobystosti: Sotsialna neobkhidnist ta bezpeka. K.: Marych, 2009. 76 s.

Fominova A.N. (2012). Zhiznestoikost’ lichnosti [Personality Resilience]. Moskva. 151 p. [in Russian]

Shmatova Yu.E. (2020). Impact of COVID-19 on Mental Health of Population (as an Indicator of Human Potential): Experience of Foreign Studies. Problems of Territory’s Development, no. 4 (108), pp. 88–108. DOI: 10.15838/ptd.2020.4.108.6

Eksakusto T. V. Psihologicheskaya bezopasnost': principy issledovaniya, definicii, model' / T. V. Eksakusto // Vestnik Pyatigorskogo gos. lingv. un-ta. – 2009. – № 3. – S. 331–334.

YUdina E.V. K probleme sindroma vygoraniya u psihologov-konsul'tantov: ekzistencial'nyj podhod // Vestnik MGGU im. M.A. SHolohova. Seriya «Pedagogika i psihologiya». 2011. № 1. S. 109–115.

Holmes E., O’Connor R., Perry V.H, Tracey I., Wessely S., Arseneault L. [et al.]. (2020). Multidisciplinary research priorities for the COVID-19 pandemic: a call for action for mental health science. The Lancet Psychiatry, vol. 7, pp. 547–560. DOI:

LaGreca (1985). The Psychosocial factors in surviving stress. Special Issue: Survivorship: The other side of death and dying. Death studies. Vol. 9. № 1. Р. 23–36.

Maddi S., Kobasa S. (1984). The Hardy Executive: Health under Stress. Homewood (IL): Dow Jones-Irwin.

O’Connor R.C., Nock M.K. (2014). The psychology of suicidal behaviour. The Lancet Psychiatry, vol. 1, pp. 73–85. DOI: 10.1016/S2215-0366(14)70222-6

Turecki G., Brent D.A., Gunnell D. [et al.] (2019). Suicide and suicide risk. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers, vol. 5, p. 74. DOI: 10.1038/s41572-019-0121-0

Reynolds D.L., Garay J.R., Deamond S.L., Moran M.K., Gold W., Styra R. (2008). Understanding, compliance and psychological impact of the SARS quarantine experience. Epidemiol. Infect., vol. 136, pp. 997–1007.

Abstract views: 35
PDF Downloads: 10
How to Cite
HREK, O. (2020). Study of vitality as a resource for providing students’ psychological safety. EUROPEAN HUMANITIES STUDIES: State and Society, 23(3(II), 4-18.